Archives

December 24, 2008

Foreclosure Sales Drop Substantially

 

Loan modification activity forestalls impact of negative equity

Discovery Bay, CA, November 12, 2008 ForeclosureRadar, the only website that tracks every California foreclosure with daily auction updates; today issued its California Foreclosure Report for October 2008. Foreclosure sales dropped by 39.1 percent from the prior month, due to significant increases in cancellations and postponements. Under California law, scheduled foreclosure sales can be postponed for a period of up to one year, until they are either cancelled or sold. Cancellations, where the home is taken out of foreclosure, increased by 78 percent in October, resulting in nearly 20 percent of foreclosure sales scheduled for October being called off.

Notice of Default filings, which start the foreclosure process, continue to be significantly impacted by CA State Senate Bill 1137, as lenders work through the new requirements the law imposed. Notices of Trustee Sale, however, rebounded after a significant drop the prior month.

High-level findings include:

·        Notice of Default filings increased slightly in October, up 2.8 percent from September, to a total of 16,810 filings. Year over year, Notice of Default filings are down 42.3 percent.

·        Notices of Trustee Sale, which schedule the auction date and time, increased by 32.9 percent in October, to 25,408 filings. Despite the significant increase, this level of filings remains well below average levels earlier this year, as September levels were clearly impacted by CA State Senate Bill 1137.

·        Properties taken to sale at auction declined by 39.1 percent from September, to 14,042 sales, with a combined loan balance of $6.39 Billion. This represents a 28.8 percent increase from the prior year.

·        Lenders took back 94 percent of the properties taken to auction, with a combined loan value of $9.19 Billion. Third party purchases declined 24 percent from the prior month, but increased 25 percent (as a percentage of all foreclosure sales), due to the decline in sales activity.

"It is important to note that the significant decline in October foreclosure sales cannot be directly attributed to CA State Senate Bill 1137," said Sean O’Toole, founder of ForeclosureRadar. "There were nearly 60,000 properties scheduled for sale at the beginning of October over which the law had no affect. The drop in foreclosure sales, therefore, can only be reasonably attributed to changes introduced by the lenders themselves and not in response to SB 1137."

The increase in cancellations was led primarily by Countrywide which saw a 460 percent increase in cancellations from the prior month, and a 48 percent decline in the number of properties they sold at auction. Other lenders had similar drops in foreclosure sales, though more often due to postponement, rather than cancellation as in Countrywide’s case. Statewide, the percentage of foreclosure sales that had postponed at least once, increased from 36 percent of sales to 58 percent of sales, with the average length of postponement increasing from 24 days to 42 days.

"It would be a mistake to conclude that the declines in foreclosure activity indicate that the foreclosure crisis is over," continued O’Toole. "While lenders now appear to be embracing the concept of foreclosure moratoriums and loan modifications, neither typically address the core issue of negative equity. Most loan modifications focus on lowering payments to affordable levels by using unsustainably low interest rates, not unlike the ‘teaser rates’ that many have blamed for the current crisis."

Average discounts offered by lenders on the outstanding loan balance at foreclosure auction declined slightly from prior months, and averaged 36.1 percent statewide, with 33 percent of properties taken to auction being offered at discounts of 50 percent or more.

At the county level there was little significant change in rankings between counties, and almost all had drops in foreclosure sales activity that roughly reflected the statewide declines.

image002.gif

ForeclosureRadar October Report by County

Rank

Change
In
Rank

County

NDF

NTS

Sales

Population
Per Sale

% Change
Sept. 2008

% Change
Oct. 2007

1

0

Merced

190

376

288

857

-32%

58%

2

1

Riverside

2037

3099

1743

1,121

-42%

6%

3

7

Yuba

60

81

62

1,126

-14%

22%

4

0

Stanislaus

404

796

447

1,151

-41%

10%

5

-3

San Joaquin

543

1066

559

1,192

-46%

-14%

6

3

San Benito

10

19

46

1,253

-29%

77%

7

0

San Bernardino

1752

2427

1450

1,374

-36%

25%

8

0

Madera

87

186

98

1,473

-39%

44%

9

-4

Solano

329

572

281

1,505

-43%

12%

10

-4

Sacramento

892

1585

881

1,573

-44%

-15%

11

0

Contra Costa

652

1083

649

1,586

-36%

18%

12

5

Imperial

93

153

94

1,772

-27%

54%

13

-1

Kern

565

763

413

1,888

-45%

-5%

14

0

Monterey

199

409

221

1,922

-40%

64%

15

18

Mariposa

2

6

9

2,024

13%

800%

16

-3

Calaveras

1

0

21

2,177

-49%

250%

17

2

Placer

233

240

142

2,229

-35%

-11%

18

13

El Dorado

91

104

69

2,554

-17%

0%

19

13

Tuolumne

31

34

22

2,647

-15%

214%

20

-5

Lake

19

25

24

2,671

-54%

-14%

21

-1

Fresno

438

608

329

2,734

-42%

8%

22

-6

Sutter

39

89

33

2,771

-54%

-20%

23

3

San Diego

1217

1863

1080

2,840

-33%

28%

24

6

Amador

23

14

13

2,933

-32%

44%

25

-2

Sonoma

178

290

161

2,981

-41%

49%

26

-2

Napa

36

98

43

3,127

-43%

30%

27

-2

Alameda

541

947

478

3,141

-40%

9%

28

-1

Tulare

177

235

133

3,163

-39%

46%

29

12

Nevada

41

49

30

3,336

-9%

36%

30

-8

Sierra

1

0

1

3,501

-50%

200%

31

-2

Ventura

258

418

231

3,538

-44%

4%

32

-14

Colusa

1

0

6

3,585

-67%

500%

33

-12

Yolo

71

124

51

3,732

-54%

-22%

34

12

Shasta

87

80

43

4,221

-12%

30%

35

1

Los Angeles

3557

4839

2413

4,246

-36%

24%

36

-8

Plumas

3

2

5

4,289

-55%

150%

37

12

Tehama

1

0

14

4,395

-59%

-22%

38

4

San Luis Obispo

85

101

57

4,618

-34%

16%

39

0

Orange

947

1384

662

4,641

-37%

18%

40

-5

Santa Barbara

93

165

89

4,737

-48%

-12%

41

2

Santa Cruz

61

102

55

4,770

-35%

41%

42

6

Glenn

2

2

6

4,775

-40%

20%

43

-6

Santa Clara

499

811

364

4,872

-44%

54%

44

1

Siskiyou

12

9

9

5,127

-31%

200%

45

-5

Butte

33

33

36

6,034

-63%

-8%

46

-8

Kings

52

48

20

7,386

-62%

-13%

47

3

San Mateo

136

163

88

8,228

-47%

22%

48

5

Marin

51

59

27

9,383

-40%

69%

49

-5

Modoc

4

1

1

9,836

-67%

-75%

50

2

Mendocino

24

18

8

11,306

-53%

100%

51

-4

Lassen

1

0

3

11,817

-70%

-75%

52

2

Humboldt

17

23

8

16,566

-64%

-20%

53

4

San Francisco

70

95

27

29,581

-47%

-41%

CALIFORNIA FORECLOSURE REPORT METHODOLOGY
Rankings are based on population per foreclosure sale.
NDF indicates the number of Notices of Default that were filed at the county, and NTS indicates filed Notices of Trustee Sale. Sales indicates the number of properties sold at foreclosure auction. Percentage changes are based on monthly Sales. The data presented by ForeclosureRadar is based on county records and individual sales results from daily foreclosure auctions throughout the state—not estimates or projections.

Filed under Blog by Elite Realty Services

Permalink Print Comment